2027 APA Pacific: NASSP CFA (Sept. 15, 2026 deadline)

North American Society for Social Philosophy at the 2027 APA Pacific

Artificial Intelligence: Is the Love Affair Over, Never Started, or Just Beginning?

Sponsored by the North American Society for Social Philosophy

March 24-27, 2027

Portland, Oregon

NASSP plans to host two affiliated group sessions during the APA Pacific Division Meeting on March 24-27, 2027, in Portland, Oregon. The theme for these sessions is Artificial Intelligence: Is the Love Affair Over, Never Started, or Just Beginning? This year’s theme invites presentations on the ethics and philosophy of artificial intelligence, particularly as it relates to AI’s impact on different areas of social interaction. 

Possible topics on this year’s theme include:

  • Philosophy and ethics of AI and emerging technologies
  • AI, education, academic integrity, authorship, institutional policy, the purposes of education, including philosophy education
  • AI, labor, employment, including displacement and automation, deskilling, surveillance, task enhancement, and meaningful work
  • The use of AI in healthcare, mental health, and caregiving, including questions of effectiveness, autonomy, and professional responsibility
  • The use of AI in law enforcement and other public institutions, algorithms, bias, and structural injustice
  • AI, humanity, agency, consciousness, emotions, and social relationships
  • AI security, privacy, transparency, responsibility, and accountability
  • Big tech, misinformation, environmental impact, corporate social responsibility, and democratic governance

Proposals for presentations in all areas of social philosophy (broadly construed) are welcome. Abstracts of 250-500 words, prepared for anonymous review, should be submitted to the Pacific Division representatives on or before the deadline: September 15, 2026. Acceptance/rejection decisions will be emailed to authors by October 10, 2026, if not sooner.

Abstracts should:

  • Convey an identifiable and engaging thesis, argument, or overall perspective.
  • Motivate the author’s approach to the issue, by outlining the argument or explaining why a particular theoretical frame is helpful.
  • Be clear and well-written, avoiding jargon when possible and explaining it when necessary.
  • Demonstrate some engagement with the relevant literature, either through brief citations or an awareness of existing contributions.

The Pacific Division Representatives:

Accessibility and Inclusivity
NASSP is committed to creating an inclusive intellectual community where philosophers from historically marginalized groups feel welcome and are able to participate. NASSP recognizes that there are a variety of barriers of entry due to systemic discrimination and oppression that might prohibit participation in its events and governance (and in professional philosophy more broadly). NASSP is committed to removing those barriers and challenging oppressive norms within the profession more broadly, specifically (though not exclusively) for those related to race, ethnicity, Indigeneity, sexual orientation, ability, class, or gender.

The Call for Abstracts is also available on philevents.org: https://philevents.org/event/show/152313 

Share this Post